Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Wallace results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 3,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,954 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,643 of 6,134 authors). This Danielle Wallace is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Danielle Wallace
Author details
Total words: 6,954
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst