Author summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 10,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Bonavita results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 5,936 hits . Analysis detected 54,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,636 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,664 of 6,140 authors). This Julia Bonavita is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Julia Bonavita
Author details
Total words: 57,636
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles57.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst