Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 12,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Ruiz results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 6,641 hits . Analysis detected 54,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,197 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,415 of 6,135 authors). This Michael Ruiz is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Michael Ruiz
Author details
Total words: 45,197
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles45.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst