Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Sabes results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 6,086 hits . Analysis detected 48,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,594 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,326 of 6,162 authors). This Adam Sabes is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Adam Sabes
Author details
Total words: 50,594
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles50.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst