Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter D'Abrosca results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 4,303 hits . Analysis detected 39,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,753 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,577 of 6,164 authors). This Peter D'Abrosca is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Peter D'Abrosca
Author details
Total words: 33,753
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst