Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Gibson results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 1,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,314 of 6,628 authors). This Jake Gibson is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Jake Gibson
Author details
Total words: 1,484
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.2% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Primacy Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst