Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsie Cairns results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 962 hits. Analysis detected 9,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,872 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,352 of 6,202 authors). This Kelsie Cairns is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Kelsie Cairns
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Kelsie Cairns (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,872
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate