Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Rumpf-Whitten results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,690 hits . Analysis detected 19,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,341 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,059 of 6,140 authors). This Sarah Rumpf-Whitten is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
Author details
Total words: 17,341
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst