Fox News87%

Athena Strand photo shows deadly ride with FedEx driver who admitted killing girl during Christmas delivery 15%

By Sarah Rumpf-Whitten0%

4/7/2026, 10:46:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 636 faulty-reasoning hits from 608 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (17,330 of 20,382 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

A haunting photo shows 7-year-old Athena Strand moments before prosecutors say she was driven to her death by the FedEx driver who abducted and killed her while delivering her Christmas present. 
The image, released by prosecutors on Tuesday, shows the young girl standing behind Tanner Horner on the day she was strangled in Texas in November 2022. 
In the black-and-white photo, Athena appears visibly uneasy as Horner focuses on the road ahead. 
Horner, 34, a former delivery driver accused of kidnapping and strangling the 7-year-old after hitting her with his van in 2022, admitted to her capital murder in a Tarrant County courthouse on Tuesday morning. 
MAN CONFESSES TO KILLING 7-YEAR-OLD WHILE ON THE LAM AFTER DNA LINKS HIM TO 30-YEAR COLD CASE: AUTHORITIES Once the jury was finally seated on Tuesday morning for the start of his trial, Tarrant County Judge George Gallagher asked Horner to stand. 
"Mr. 
Horner, to the charge of capital murder, you may plead guilty or not guilty. 
What is your plea?" 
the judge asked. 
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X "Guilty, your honor," Horner replied. 
"Thank you. 
I will accept your plea," the judge said. 
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER 
Horner admitted to abducting Strand while delivering a package to her father’s home in Paradise, a town of fewer than 500 people about 60 miles northwest of Dallas. 
Her body was found on Dec. 2 two days after she was reported missing less than 10 miles away from the property. 
Horner, authorities said, was delivering a package of Barbie dolls intended to be Strand’s Christmas present. 
Athena was set to return to Oklahoma with her mother after the holidays and had been staying with her father, Jacob Strand, and stepmother, Ashley Strand, in Wise County. 
SEND US A TIP HERE According to the arrest warrant, Horner told investigators that he strangled the 7-year-old after accidentally hitting her with his van while making a delivery at her father’s home. 
He said Strand wasn't seriously hurt after he hit her while backing up, but he panicked and put her in his van. 
On Tuesday, Ashley Strand testified sharing the immediate aftermath when she realized that her stepdaughter had vanished. 
LISTEN TO THE NEW 'CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO' PODCAST "I thought maybe she was just hiding somewhere," her stepmom said. 
The only thing she noticed that was unusual or out of place on the property was a package from Walmart containing Barbie dolls that she had ordered for Athena as a Christmas present. 
It had been dropped off in front of an abandoned trailer that was on the property. 
LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING? 
FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB 
Athena was reported missing, and eventually an Amber Alert was issued, leading to 72 hours of searching. 
Wise County's former Sheriff Lane Akin also testified, sharing that the search efforts for the 7-year-old was a grassroots effort with community members standing "shoulder to shoulder" with police. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP "I'll never forget the morning of Dec. 1, citizens came from all parts of Wise County to help us find that child. 
And we put them to work with our deputies, with our investigators, with our game wardens. 
It was shoulder to shoulder. 
We had what we estimated was about 300 citizens and they brought their 4-wheelers. 
Some brought horses. 
Some brought dogs," Akin said. 
"I appreciate the fact that so many people came out to help us that day." 
Fox News Digital's Danielle Wallace contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 5.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 3.2%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 9.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.6%This article: 4.6%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 5.1%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 8.7%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 10.3%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias5.1%This article: 2.5%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 5.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.8%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.7%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.3%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.2%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 15.5%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.9%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 4.3%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization6.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 3.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.1%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 4.1%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion5.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.8%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 5.5%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 3.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.9%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 2.6%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 0.6%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Sarah Rumpf-Whitten: 2.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.1%

608 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers38%attributed speech376writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Gallagher • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Gallagher • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Gallagher • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTanner Horner • 13 words • 100.0% coverageGeorge Gallagher • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Gallagher • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageTanner Horner • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Strand • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAshley Strand • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Strand • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 30 words • 100.0% coverageLane Akin • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLane Akin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lane Akin

67%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words38% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+34.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lane Akin: 34.1%34.1%Attempt to Sell a Product +20.5 ptsWriter: 13.6%Lane Akin: 34.1%34.1%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Lane Akin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.