Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Spunt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,427 hits . Analysis detected 7,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,198 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,970 of 6,628 authors). This David Spunt is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. David Spunt
Author details
Total words: 5,198
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 27.4% 27.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst