Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooke Singman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 1,033 hits . Analysis detected 4,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,938 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 95% (317 of 6,234 authors). This Brooke Singman is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Brooke Singman
Author details
Total words: 1,938
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 53.3% 53.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 31.6% 31.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.1% 27.1% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.1% 14.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.0% 34.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.9% 9.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 53.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 34.0%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Author 31.6%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 27.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst