Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Papa results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 426 hits . Analysis detected 2,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,053 of 6,194 authors). This Ashley Papa is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Ashley Papa
Author details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst