Author summary
36% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Pack results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 2,390 hits . Analysis detected 18,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,790 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,627 of 6,244 authors). This Adam Pack is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Adam Pack
Author details
Total words: 26,790
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles26.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst