Author summary
51% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Pinedo results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 3,976 hits . Analysis detected 32,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,775 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,668 of 6,162 authors). This Peter Pinedo is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Peter Pinedo
Author details
Total words: 33,775
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles33.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst