Fox News88%

Controversial ICE tactic actually reduces unintended 'collateral' arrests: federal agent 83%

By Peter Pinedo51%

7/17/2026, 12:55:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 2,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 865 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,492 of 20,453 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the article peer group.

Following a week of U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) vehicle stops making national headlines, a federal special agent working in deportations revealed why vehicle stops are a "very important" part of the agency’s operations. 
After the second ICE officer-involved shooting in a week took place in Maine on Monday, agents nationwide were given guidance to pause vehicle stops until further notice. 
That guidance, however, was overruled by President Donald Trump on Wednesday, who called vehicle stops "one of ICE's most important and effective Crime Fighting tools." 
Though controversial, the agent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said vehicle stops are actually the preferred tactic for many officers, because they are safer for both law enforcement and the subject than home apprehensions, and they allow more time to identify the target than street apprehensions. 
Perhaps most notably, while vehicle stops have been widely criticized, the agent explained that they decrease "collateral" arrests, which they said are the apprehension of illegal immigrants who were not the target of the operation but were "at the wrong place at the right time." 
"[Vehicle stops] lead to a higher success rate in apprehending the target that they [ICE officers] are looking for and not getting the collateral. 
The collateral is the person that we’re not looking for, but we encounter, and they deem them as having no legal presence and/or illegal; therefore, they are going to have an admin arrest done on them." 
ICE RESUMES NATIONWIDE TRAFFIC STOPS UNDER NEW POLICY REQUIRING BODY CAMERAS 
The agent said vehicle stops are a "daily" part of ICE’s operations. 
They described the stops as a critical "tool in the toolbox" for federal officers working on deportation operations. 
Simon Hankinson, a senior research fellow on border security and immigration at the Heritage Foundation, explained that vehicle stops have become increasingly "crucial" due to growing operational risks. 
"When you have to go to someone's house, we've seen how difficult that can be if they don't want you in. 
You need warrants, and if you're breaking down doors, chances of somebody getting hurt are significantly higher," he said. 
"What they're trying to do is find people and take them into custody in the calmest, quietest, safest manner possible," Hankinson continued. 
"So, ideal is when local law enforcement and police presence will honor ICE detainers, and they'll hand them over at prisons when they're finished their sentence or their hearing or whatever it is. 
But when they release particularly violent criminals into the city, they will go to ground, they'll hide, they'll hide in places where they're hard to find. 
And so, it is easier to stop them in their vehicle when they are going from A to B than it is to try to pick them up in a building with doors that are locked." 
At the same time, Hankinson called out groups using the possibility of danger in these operations to push for an end to all enforcement operations. 
DOJ ACCUSES MARYLAND OF 'ACTIVE AND DELIBERATE EFFORT' TO PREVENT DEPORTATIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS: LAWSUIT 
"They will pretend that what they really want is safety and that they just don’t want anybody getting hurt. 
But if you scratch the surface, you realize that's not actually their goal. 
If we were able to carry out deportations in 100% perfect safety and security, they would still oppose it." 
In a social media post this week, Trump wrote, "We CANNOT give up one of ICE's most important and effective Crime fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!" 
The president reasoned that the announced DHS policy shift would be "playing right into the criminal’s [sic] hands." 
Addressing federal agents directly, he then said, "ICE, be judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job." 
The agent said that Trump’s reversal was a "huge" boost for ICE officers. 
The agent also noted that despite the reversal, new training on vehicle stops and how to respond to dangerous situations is already being administered to many officers operating in the field. 
They said that, especially given the increase in often adversarial public attention, they would "welcome" even more training for officers on vehicle stops. 
"Any time you take a tool out of the toolbox, it is going to create challenges for [agents] to do their job in a more efficient way," the agent said. 
HARRIS CALLS FOR ICE PROBE AFTER MAINE SHOOTING AMID RENEWED 'BORDER CZAR' CRITICISM 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
"In other words, if I'm encountering them on a sidewalk, and they see me, and they can get in the car and leave, that's what they're going to do. 
And I don't have any recourse, or our team will not have a recourse to go after him and stop him," the agent said. 
"We'd have to hope he stops or, God forbid, he crashes into something and causes property and/or bodily harm to someone else, a third party." 
"I don’t want to hurt anyone; I really don’t," they said. 
"I think any sane person would be in agreement with me to say, ‘Hey, let's look at how we can do this safer for everybody.'" 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Peter Pinedo: 2.7%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Peter Pinedo: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 7.4%Peter Pinedo: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 1.9%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Peter Pinedo: 11.8%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect14.9%This article: 5.4%Peter Pinedo: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion5.4%This article: 10.9%Peter Pinedo: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Peter Pinedo: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 2.2%Peter Pinedo: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 27.6%Peter Pinedo: 8.8%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias27.6%This article: 2.8%Peter Pinedo: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 1.5%Peter Pinedo: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Peter Pinedo: 2.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias3.0%This article: 2.9%Peter Pinedo: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.9%This article: 7.5%Peter Pinedo: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Peter Pinedo: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Peter Pinedo: 4.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem2.2%This article: 2.9%Peter Pinedo: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man2.9%This article: 18.7%Peter Pinedo: 4.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority18.7%This article: 10.9%Peter Pinedo: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma10.9%This article: 7.6%Peter Pinedo: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope7.6%This article: 4.2%Peter Pinedo: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning4.2%This article: 17.0%Peter Pinedo: 7.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization17.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.9%Peter Pinedo: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.9%This article: 16.1%Peter Pinedo: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion16.1%This article: 4.0%Peter Pinedo: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question4.0%This article: 5.2%Peter Pinedo: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 1.3%Peter Pinedo: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque1.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.6%Peter Pinedo: 2.4%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal11.6%This article: 2.2%Peter Pinedo: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.2%This article: 9.4%Peter Pinedo: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.8%Peter Pinedo: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading3.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.2%Peter Pinedo: 3.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice9.2%This article: 5.4%Peter Pinedo: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination5.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Pinedo: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Peter Pinedo: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

865 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech505writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 36 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSimon Hankinson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
91 attributed words25% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+16.6 ptsWriter: 10.9%Donald Trump: 27.5%27.5%Indoctrination+19.2 ptsWriter: 5.0%Donald Trump: 24.2%24.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.