Topic summary
55% 156 analyzed articles/videos 112,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 60,688 hits . Analysis detected 596,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 615,731 analyzed words across 155 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,030 of 15,539 topics). This Immigration Policy is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Immigration Policy
Topic details
Total words: 615,731
Article count: 155
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score155 analyzed articles615.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst