Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charissa Cheong results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Self-Serving Bias , and Anecdotal , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,321 authors). This Charissa Cheong is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Charissa Cheong
Author details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst