Author summary
14%1 analyzed article/video2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Austin Chronicle News Staff results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 3,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,078 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,955 of 6,222 authors). This The Austin Chronicle News Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
The Austin Chronicle News Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
53%The Austin Chronicle News Staff (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,078
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.4%8.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos