Author summary
59% 34 analyzed articles/videos 34,322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aisha Wallace-Palomares results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 23,626 hits . Analysis detected 144,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 125,003 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,735 of 6,163 authors). This Aisha Wallace-Palomares is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Aisha Wallace-Palomares
Author details
Total words: 125,003
Article count: 34
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score34 analyzed articles125K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst