Author summary
0% 31 analyzed articles/videos 36,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erwin Recinos results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 25,469 hits . Analysis detected 178,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 143,763 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,291 of 6,135 authors). This Erwin Recinos is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Erwin Recinos
Author details
Total words: 143,763
Article count: 31
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score31 analyzed articles143.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst