Author summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 30,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hadley Tomicki results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 13,523 hits . Analysis detected 103,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 99,676 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,350 of 6,136 authors). This Hadley Tomicki is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Hadley Tomicki
Author details
Total words: 99,676
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score18 analyzed articles99.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst