Author summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 27,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianne Le results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 10,103 hits . Analysis detected 95,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 96,756 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,662 of 6,138 authors). This Julianne Le is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Julianne Le
Author details
Total words: 96,756
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score18 analyzed articles96.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst