Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alejandra Cid results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 2,971 hits . Analysis detected 18,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,718 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,014 of 6,565 authors). This Alejandra Cid is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Alejandra Cid
Author details
Total words: 15,718
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.0% 15.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.9% 18.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.1% 13.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst