Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valeria Macias results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 962 hits . Analysis detected 10,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,408 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,509 of 6,195 authors). This Valeria Macias is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Valeria Macias
Author details
Total words: 15,408
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst