Author summary
89% 15 analyzed articles/videos 18,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Cabral results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 9,331 hits . Analysis detected 85,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,897 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,263 of 6,495 authors). This Javier Cabral is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Javier Cabral
Author details
Total words: 61,897
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles61.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst