L.A. TACO85%

Hunger Strikers Facing Solitary Confinement in Adelanto ICE Processing Center, According To Anonymous Source 41%

By Aisha Wallace-Palomares61%

6/4/2026, 2:11:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 604 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,036 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the article peer group.

“They came with paint ball guns spray of maze and taking one of the guys to the SHU/hole. 
They whispering and looking up to my cell. 
They coming for me,” reads an urgent text message sent last night by a detainee inside of the Adelanto ICE Processing Center to one of their family members. 
The message arrived at 7:20 p.m. on Wednesday night, shortly before the family member lost communication with the detainee for over two hours. 
Speaking with L.A. 
TACO, the family member asks to remain anonymous, due to fears of retaliation. 
They say they received a call around 10 p.m. from their loved one, confirming they were in solitary confinement. 
The detainee shared that he was held inside a solitary housing unit for refusing to eat the facility's food while participating in an ongoing hunger strike within the facility. 
They also shared that at least nine other people were taken into solitary housing units [SHU], aka "the hole" or "the shoe." 
The Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice says that around 8-10 people were placed in solitary confinement due to their participation in the hunger strike, including the individuals who spoke with members of Congress during an oversight visit on Monday, according to reporting by L.A. 
TACO. 
According to the wife of another detainee participating in the hunger strike, her husband has not been able to receive the medication he requires since Tuesday. 
The anonymous family member who says their loved one was taken to solitary confinement also shared that the cell lacked a mattress and was super dirty. 
They also allege that the detainee had asked for cleaning supplies and a mattress, and had been requesting to speak with a lieutenant or sergeant. 
He is also said to have requested medical help after feeling weak. 
The last time the detainee spoke with their family member was at 1:44 a.m., early this Thursday morning. 
“From inside the facility please dear USA or even the world bring awareness to this matter as it has to be taken care of,” reads another text message that was sent before the detainee was taken to solitary confinement. 
“Till than the three of us gone take them head up with no fear in the most peaceful and humbles way. 
As we use the proper law codes etc. 
Pray for each one in facilities like this and keep raising awareness. 
This message was sent by one of the three out of Adelanto, Ca facilities.” 
A hunger strike has been ongoing at the Adelanto ICE Processing facilities since May 18 or 19, according to reporting by L.A. 
TACO. 
On Monday, 150 detainees inside the Adelanto ICE Processing Center-West signed a writ petition that decried inhumane conditions within the facility, according to L.A. 
TACO’s own reporting. 
The document alleged unsafe drinking water, lack of medical care, unlawful detention, and violations of the Fifth Amendment-stated rights to due process. 
Around the country, hunger strikes are reportedly taking place at several detention facilities, including Delaney Hall in New Jersey which became a flashpoint between community protesters and federal immigration agencies. 
DHS denies the claims of a hunger strike occurring at Delaney Hall. 
“FALSE. 
There is no hunger strike at Adelanto. 
No one is being abused,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement to L.A. 
TACO. 
A spokesperson for GEO Group, owner and operator of the Adelanto facility, also told L.A. 
TACO that they reject these allegations, which they claim is part of a “politically motivated campaign.” 
They referred additional comments regarding the hunger strike to ICE. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.7%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.3%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias20.7%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.6%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 5.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 18.1%L.A. TACO: 11.5%Framing Effect10.8%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.8%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 33.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 19.0%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias33.9%This article: 6.1%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias6.1%This article: 4.8%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.1%L.A. TACO: 4.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.8%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority16.9%This article: 1.2%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 3.3%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization8.6%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.1%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 15.4%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion13.1%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.8%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof7.6%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 48.3%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 9.2%L.A. TACO: 5.7%Anecdotal48.3%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.3%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.8%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.3%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.3%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading1.3%This article: 2.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy2.6%This article: 4.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.7%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 14.1%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection14.1%This article: 2.2%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 5.1%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice2.2%This article: 8.4%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination8.4%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 2.6%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

604 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers19%attributed speech492writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageInland Coalition for Immigrant Justice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGEO Group • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGEO Group • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words33% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-17.3 ptsWriter: 17.3%Department of Homeland Security: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Department of Homeland Security: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Department of Homeland Security: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Department of Homeland Security: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.