Keyword summary
37% 16 analyzed articles/videos 13,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger Strike results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 11,042 hits . Analysis detected 83,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 106,227 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,180 of 37,536 keywords). This Hunger Strike is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Hunger Strike
Keyword details
Total words: 106,227
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score16 analyzed articles106.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst