Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sonal Nain results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 258 hits . Analysis detected 2,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,427 of 6,365 authors). This Sonal Nain is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Sonal Nain
Author details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst