Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biplob Kumar Das results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 6,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (1,140 of 6,137 authors). This Biplob Kumar Das is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Biplob Kumar Das
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠82%Biplob Kumar Das (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,912
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 20.9%20.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.3%23.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos