Author summary
ā 73% 26 analyzed articles/videos 25,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Hurowitz results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 15,063 hits . Analysis detected 124,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 111,995 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ā 34% (4,073 of 6,135 authors). This Noah Hurowitz is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Noah Hurowitz
Author details
Total words: 111,995
Article count: 26
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score26 analyzed articles112K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Politically Left Leaning ā¦ Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst