Author summary
60%2 analyzed articles/videos1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glen Stellmacher results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,606 hits. Analysis detected 7,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,470 of 6,163 authors). This Glen Stellmacher is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Glen Stellmacher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Glen Stellmacher (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,116
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate