Author summary
47% 5 analyzed articles/videos 6,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Friedman results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 3,837 hits . Analysis detected 25,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,228 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,586 of 6,628 authors). This Dan Friedman is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Dan Friedman
Author details
Total words: 32,228
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles32.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst