Author summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Schwellenbach results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 2,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,376 of 6,625 authors). This Nick Schwellenbach is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Nick Schwellenbach
Author details
Total words: 4,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst