Undercover Cops Infiltrated Delaney Hall ICE Protest to Spy and Make Arrest 9%

By C. Frances0% Noah Hurowitz73%

6/18/2026, 4:49:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 1,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,316 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (18,665 of 20,363 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the article peer group.

Detectives with the Newark Police Division of the city’s Department of Public Safety went undercover to infiltrate protests outside U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Delaney Hall detention facility earlier this month, according to court records obtained by The Intercept. 
At the June 3 protests outside the detention center sparked by a hunger strike inside, detectives in plainclothes worked alongside uniformed officers to arrest Samuel Becker, a protester alleged to have thrown items into a fire days earlier, according to a criminal complaint. 
The protests had taken place for nearly a month outside Delaney Hall, a privately run ICE facility located on an industrial corridor in Newark, New Jersey, where detainees and their families have complained of poor conditions and retaliation by staff. 
“The use of plainclothes officers presents the concern of people constantly being surveilled when they are engaging in First Amendment-protected activity.” 
The operation was strictly aimed at arresting Becker, 30, who is accused of dragging a tarp into a fire during a raucous protest several days earlier, according to the complaint filed in Newark Municipal Court by police officer Elddy Torres. 
“A PLAN WAS DEVISED TO DEPLOY TWO UNDERCOVER NEWARK POLICE DETECTIVES TO MONITOR AND REPORT REAL TIME INFORMATION TO SURVEILLANCE UNITS,” Torres wrote, describing what happened after Becker was identified. 
“AS THE UNDERCOVER DETECTIVES REMAINED WITHIN THE CROWD, BECKER WAS OBSERVED COORDINATING PROTESTERS PAST THE BARRICADED PROTEST ZONE.” 
Law enforcement presence at protests can have a chilling effect, said Amol Sinha, the executive director of the New Jersey chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, who declined to discuss the specifics of the arrest, with which he was not familiar. 
The psychological effect of undercover officers  and the fear of undercovers  stands out as especially problematic. 
“The use of plainclothes officers presents the concern of people constantly being surveilled when they are engaging in First Amendment-protected activity,” Sinha told The Intercept. 
“These are moments that should be celebrated as part of democracy and not viewed through the lens of suspicion.” 
While the use of undercover officers at protests is not unusual, advocates said the tactic could raise questions about suppression of speech if the aim goes beyond keeping the peace, according to Aedan Neary, a defense attorney in Kearny, who is not involved in the case. 
“The concern arises out of the question of, at what point do the actions of these undercover agents become a pressure tactic as opposed to a law enforcement tactic?” 
Neary told The Intercept. 
“Is this being used to ensure that things remain peaceful? 
Or is this more about gathering intelligence?” 
ICE Role Unmentioned 
The arrest and police report also raise thorny questions about cooperation between ICE and local authorities, which is prohibited for immigration matters by a New Jersey state law passed in March. 
According to Becker and two eyewitnesses to the arrest, ICE agents led the ambush that led to Becker’s detention and initially took him into custody. 
“An ICE agent chased and grabbed me and quickly handed me over to an NPD officer,” Becker told The Intercept in a written statement. 
“The NPD officer brought me back over to the other side of the street and sat me down on the side of the ICE minivan that led the ambush.” 
“An ICE agent chased and grabbed me and quickly handed me over to an NPD officer.” 
While Newark police and Becker’s accounts align on basic details  such as the time and location of the arrest behind Delaney Hall, where protesters had gone to monitor vehicle traffic in and out of the facility  the complaint by Torres, the officer, says the arrest was the work of Newark police with the support of Essex County Police, omitting ICE’s role. 
“ONE OF THE NPD UNDERCOVER DETECTIVES ADVISED US THAT THE GROUP WAS PLANNING TO LIGHT THE DUMPSTER ON FIRE AND PUSH IT IN THE REAR FENCE EXIT. 
A PLAN WAS DEVISED TO INTERRUPT THE GROUPS CONDUCT AND DISPERSE THEM BEFORE THEY COULD HURT ANYONE OR CAUSE ANY DAMAGE,” said Torres’s complaint. 
“NUMEROUS NPD DETECTIVES AND ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE SWAT PERSONNEL RESPONDED TO THE AREA TO MOVE THE GROUP ALONG.” 
At least one of the vehicles that arrived in the convoy to make the arrest, Becker told The Intercept, was driven by ICE agents, converging on the group at the rear of Delaney Hall. 
According to Becker, his interaction with that initial ICE agent making the arrest indicated some degree of intelligence sharing between federal authorities and local police. 
“As I was surrounded by ICE agents and the arresting officer, one of the ICE agents accused me of [setting a] fire a different night,” Becker told The Intercept in a statement. 
“The ICE agent’s words matched the language NPD used when it put out a statement about my arrest the next day.” 
In a statement made in a Facebook post announcing Becker’s arrest, Newark Public Safety Director Emanuel Miranda said, “He was identified by Newark Police as the individual responsible for setting a dumpster fire during the weekend protest at Delaney Hall and also attempting to start a second fire there on Wednesday night.” 
The two eyewitnesses, who asked for anonymity for fear of retribution, confirmed Becker’s account of the arrest in interviews with The Intercept. 
No Sanctuary 
Demonstrations outside Delaney Hall were relatively small but attracted attention due to the ferocious responses from ICE agents and employees of GEO Group, the private prison firm that operates the jail. 
Over the course of several weeks, ICE agents repeatedly charged protesters in an effort to clear them from the entrance to allow vehicles to move in and out of the facility, often deploying batons, pepper spray, and pepper balls against demonstrators, as well as taking some into custody. 
Becker suffered an injury during a charge by ICE agents, when one agent swung a baton so hard that it fractured Becker’s shoulder, according to his account. 
On the night of his arrest, Becker’s arm was in a sling. 
After initially keeping a wide berth from the clashes, state and local police operating under orders from Baraka and New Jersey Gov. 
Mikie Sherrill  both of whom are Democrats who have spoken out against ICE crackdowns  involved themselves in policing the protesters in late May. 
The scene immediately became even more volatile, with police firing tear-gas canisters, charging protesters on horseback, and kettling dozens of protesters for mass arrest. 
On May 31, Baraka instituted a curfew in the vicinity of Delaney Hall, and Newark police set up barricades to keep protesters more than half a mile away from the facility for several days. 
In the weeks since the curfew ended, protests have continued sporadically, but with less intensity or energy as in the initial weeks. 
Baraka has repeatedly sought to minimize the city’s role in policing the protests, claiming he was trying to “bring down the temperature,” not bring an end to protests. 
That posture eventually shifted. 
“It is not the responsibility of the Newark Police Division to secure a private facility,” Baraka said in a June 4 statement. 
“Our intention was never to protect Delaney Hall or HSI”  ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations division  “but to bring calm. 
It is a clear contradiction to the city’s position with GEO group to remain there.” 
For Becker and many other protesters, the presence of police from various agencies in New Jersey were a godsend to ICE and GEO Group  not to public safety. 
“State and local police ramped up their repression of the protestors because ICE agents were having an increasingly difficult time carrying out their daily operations at Delaney Hall by themselves,” Becker said. 
“Without the ramped-up support of the state and local police, ICE and GEO would have continued to encounter growing difficulty suppressing the strike and operating the concentration camp.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.8%C. Frances: 3.0%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%C. Frances: 1.9%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.3%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.3%C. Frances: 6.1%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect34.3%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%C. Frances: 5.3%The Intercept: 12.5%Negativity Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 3.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 2.8%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%C. Frances: 2.7%The Intercept: 2.5%Ad Hominem1.9%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%C. Frances: 1.3%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 8.4%C. Frances: 1.6%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma8.4%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%C. Frances: 6.0%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.1%C. Frances: 4.2%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 2.3%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%C. Frances: 1.0%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote1.6%This article: 1.6%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 6.8%C. Frances: 2.7%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice6.8%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.3%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 3.4%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1316 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers38%attributed speech816writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageElddy Torres • 30 words • 0.0% coverageElddy Torres • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAmol Sinha • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAmol Sinha • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageAedan Neary • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAedan Neary • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAedan Neary • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 63 words • 0.0% coverageElddy Torres • 27 words • 0.0% coverageElddy Torres • 24 words • 0.0% coverageElddy Torres • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEmanuel Miranda • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRas Baraka • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRas Baraka • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRas Baraka • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Becker • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Aedan Neary

78%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words9.2% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%Aedan Neary: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Aedan Neary: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Aedan Neary: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.