Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aedan Neary results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 78.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 69.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 63.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,586 of 28,364 speakers). This Aedan Neary is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Aedan Neary
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
63.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 78.3%78.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 48.4%48.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 78.3%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos