Keyword summary
46% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Newark results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,596 hits . Analysis detected 20,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,896 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (28,260 of 34,363 keywords). This Newark is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Newark
Keyword details
Total words: 24,896
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst