Publication summary
15% 7 analyzed articles/videos 978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chalkbeat results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 2,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,246 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (178 of 410 publications). This Chalkbeat is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,246
Article count: 7
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst