Chalkbeat⁠15%

Chalkbeat News Feed ⁠52%

7/15/2026, 10:18:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 71.2% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 250 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,520 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the article peer group.

Chicago Public Schools releases $9.88 billion 2026-27 budget amid deepening financial strain 
15 candidates for 5 seats: See who’s running for school board at IPS and other Indianapolis area districts 
Iowa school districts quietly agreed to new limits on undocumented students’ course access 
The high cost of low pay: How NYC’s paraprofessional shortage leaves students with disabilities stranded 
DPSCD board approves new teacher contract that includes pay raises, AI policy 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 24.7%Chalkbeat: 1.9%Availability Heuristic24.7%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%Chalkbeat: 9.5%Framing Effect34.2%This article: 20.5%Chalkbeat: 0.6%Loss Aversion20.5%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.4%Chalkbeat: 4.6%Optimism Bias16.4%This article: 20.5%Chalkbeat: 1.1%Pessimism Bias20.5%This article: 54.8%Chalkbeat: 10.0%Negativity Bias54.8%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Chalkbeat: 0.8%Primacy Effect16.4%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 20.5%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.5%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 38.4%Chalkbeat: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)38.4%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 71.2%Chalkbeat: 4.7%Biased Writer Voice71.2%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 24.7%Chalkbeat: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…24.7%

73 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers33%attributed speech49writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageChicago Public Schools • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDPSCD board • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words50% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+42.9 ptsWriter: 57.1%Chicago Public Schools: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -36.7 ptsWriter: 36.7%Chicago Public Schools: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.