Topic summary
55% 69 analyzed articles/videos 18,818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finance results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 12,569 hits . Analysis detected 128,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 129,864 analyzed words across 69 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,702 of 15,365 topics). This Finance is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Finance
Topic details
Total words: 129,864
Article count: 69
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score69 analyzed articles129.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst