Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sara DiNatale results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 2,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Sara DiNatale is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sara DiNatale
Author details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Burden of Proof: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst