Author summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Osborne results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,192 hits . Analysis detected 8,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,715 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,827 of 6,362 authors). This Charlie Osborne is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Charlie Osborne
Author details
Total words: 10,715
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst