Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Adisa Hargett-Robinson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 971 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,228 authors). This Adisa Hargett-Robinson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Adisa Hargett-Robinson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Adisa Hargett-Robinson (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate