Author summary
72% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Pearl results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 2,646 hits . Analysis detected 15,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,100 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,128 of 6,348 authors). This Mike Pearl is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Mike Pearl
Author details
Total words: 11,100
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.8% 23.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.1% 5.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst