Author summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Hou results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 286 hits . Analysis detected 2,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,874 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,339 of 6,359 authors). This Joanna Hou is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Joanna Hou
Author details
Total words: 5,874
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst