Keyword summary
â 67% 16 analyzed articles/videos 8,993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iowa results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 5,647 hits . Analysis detected 45,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 72,825 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of â 3% (33,851 of 34,727 keywords). This Iowa is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Iowa
Keyword details
Total words: 72,825
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles72.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst