Author summary
â 35% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steph Conquest-Ware results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,863 hits . Analysis detected 8,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,876 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of â 14% (5,476 of 6,306 authors). This Steph Conquest-Ware is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Steph Conquest-Ware
Author details
Total words: 13,876
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst