Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Ziegler results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,254 of 6,628 authors). This Laura Ziegler is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Laura Ziegler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Laura Ziegler (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate