Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Ziegler results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,254 of 6,628 authors). This Laura Ziegler is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Laura Ziegler
Author details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst