Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley J. DiMella results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 2,780 hits . Analysis detected 19,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,555 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,719 of 6,163 authors). This Ashley J. DiMella is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Ashley J. DiMella
Author details
Total words: 22,555
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst