Fox News89%

Police rush to SCOTUS justice’s home amid rising threats against conservatives  but report quickly unravels 47%

By Ashley J. DiMella0%

5/28/2026, 8:25:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Quote-first Misdirection, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 612 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,593 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the article peer group.

Police responded to a "swatting call" at the residence of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in Virginia on Wednesday evening, police confirmed, marking the latest security scare involving a conservative public figure. 
"Yesterday evening at approximately 9:02 p.m., officers responded to a swatting call at the residence of U.S. 
Supreme Court Justice in Fairfax County," a Fairfax County Police Department public information officer told Fox News Digital on Thursday when asked about reports concerning the incident at Coney Barrett’s home. 
Fairfax police responded to Barrett's home after they received a call through the department’s non-emergency line, then met with the justice’s security detail, who confirmed the report was "fictitious," the officer told Fox News Digital. 
The incident comes amid years of heightened threats against Supreme Court justices, including protests outside conservative justices’ homes after the leaked Dobbs draft opinion in 2022 showing the court was poised to overturn Roe v. 
Wade, and the arrest near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home of a California man who was later charged with attempted murder. 
FBI INVESTIGATING RISE IN SWATTING INCIDENTS AFTER SEVERAL CONSERVATIVES TARGETED, KASH PATEL SAYS 
"Officers immediately coordinated with Supreme Court Police personnel assigned to the residence and quickly determined that the report was fictitious. 
No additional police resources were utilized," the police department said. 
Swatting calls target an individual by calling in a false police report for crimes  such as a murder, a hostage situation, bomb threats or active shooters that would require a greater law enforcement response  to the home of the target. 
A partial audio recording of the police audio surfaced on X on Thursday that reported a "call came in for sounds of gunshots." 
Law enforcement can be heard saying there was a "suspicious noise" at a 24-hour security coverage for a "high-priority resident" of the county. 
FROM RALLY GUNFIRE TO WHITE HOUSE SHOOTING, THREATS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP CONTINUE TO MOUNT 
Barrett was on the bench Thursday morning alongside her colleagues, and read aloud summaries of two opinions she authored. 
Barrett made no mention of the Wednesday incident in her bench remarks. 
"Swatting is an attempt to get an innocent person killed—in this case, a sitting Supreme Court Justice," posted Republican Utah Sen, Mike Lee on X as reports of the incident surfaced Thursday. 
"The proper response will be putting the offender in prison for many, many years." 
MIKE DAVIS: THE SUPREME COURT BETRAYED AGAIN  THIS TIME FROM THE BENCH 
The leaked Dobbs draft opinion became a lightning rod for protests, with abortion-rights activists demonstrating outside the homes of Barrett, Kavanaugh and other members of the court’s conservative majority. 
In June 2022, Californian Nicholas John Roske was charged with attempted murder for making violent threats against Kavanaugh while carrying a gun, knife and pepper spray near the justice’s home. 
He was later sentenced to eight years behind bars. 
Attacks on conservative leaders have been on the rise, most recently targeting the commander in chief, including just in April at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner. 
There were two public assassination attempts on Trump’s life in 2024, beginning in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a bullet grazed his ear after a gunman climbed onto a roof during a rally on July 13, 2024. 
Earlier this month, a California Army veteran known for his display of "Make America Great Again" memorabilia and American flags outside his residence, dubbed the "Trump House," was attacked and beaten to death. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Fox News Digital reached out to the Supreme Court for comment. 
Fox News' Bill Mears contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.8%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.9%Ashley J. DiMella: 4.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic20.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Ashley J. DiMella: 12.3%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 3.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 29.9%Ashley J. DiMella: 8.2%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias29.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.5%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.1%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Ashley J. DiMella: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem2.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.2%Ashley J. DiMella: 5.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority7.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.6%Ashley J. DiMella: 4.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization9.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.5%Ashley J. DiMella: 6.7%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.8%Ashley J. DiMella: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.1%Ashley J. DiMella: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal11.1%This article: 2.1%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.1%This article: 11.6%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.3%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote10.3%This article: 20.9%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection20.9%This article: 12.4%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.8%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice12.4%This article: 2.3%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination2.3%This article: 0.0%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Ashley J. DiMella: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias20.3%This article: 1.3%Ashley J. DiMella: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

612 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers23%attributed speech471writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageFairfax County Police Department • 31 words • 0.0% coverageFairfax County Police Department • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coveragepolice department • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lee • 32 words • 100.0% coverageMike Lee • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageFox News Digital • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBill Mears • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Lee

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words33% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Quote-first Misdirection+49.2 ptsWriter: 20.4%Mike Lee: 69.6%69.6%Indoctrination+30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Lee: 30.4%30.4%Politically Right Leaning -26.3 ptsWriter: 26.3%Mike Lee: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.1 ptsWriter: 16.1%Mike Lee: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-13.4 ptsWriter: 13.4%Mike Lee: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Mike Lee: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.