Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Confirmation Of Amy Coney Barrett results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 2,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,885 of 16,562 topics). This Confirmation Of Amy Coney Barrett is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Confirmation Of Amy Coney Barrett
Topic details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos